Life in the countryside is not for young generation

That's a very difficult question.

There is a well-known fact that life in the countryside differs from a living in a cosmopolitan center. Some people think that young generation can study and develop their skills living only in a big city. But others are against it and believe that they can do it everywhere even in the countryside. Let me speculate what makes them think so. Personally, I believe that it would be better for the young people to live in a city. First of all, there are more chances to get a good education. Second of all, a rhythm of the city is faster than in the countryside and almost every student can get a valuable experience living there. Moreover, young people can make a lot of good relationships and find well-paid job in the near future.

But some people cannot agree with my point of view. They strongly believe that it is very expensive. Secondly, I they think it is terrible to live far from parents. Nevertheless, these arguments do not sound very convincing to me. Firstly, is it possible to find some items and living residence even cheaper than in the countryside. Secondly, every young student should be prepared to live without parents and solve problems by himself. In conclusion, taking everything into consideration I strongly believe that living in the village is not a right decision for a young people, because they have enough energy to develop themselves in a big city.

Thanks for your attention.

1. Life in the countryside is not for young people
2. Life in the countryside is not for young people.
3. Life in the countryside is not for young people
4. Life in countryside is not for young people (с переводом)
5. «My parents say the way they lived in the past was more secure. However, I believe that young people are given a lot more life opportunities nowadays».